Penyusunan Strategi Rantai Pasok Komoditas Sayur Menggunakan Analisis Strukur Biaya Logistik

Melinda Sugiana Dharmawati, Adi Djoko Guritno, Henry Yuliando

Abstract


Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk penggambaran struktur rantai pasok sayur, analisis struktur biaya logistik, dan menyusun alternatif strategi bagi tier rantai pasok sayur dalam rangka pemerataan distribusi pendapatan dan meningkatkan pendapatan petani. Total responden pada penelitian ini sebanyak 197 orang. Metode yang digunakan untuk melakukan analisis biaya logistik adalah metode Activity-Based Costing. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah sistem rantai pasok komoditas sayur terdiri dari lima tier, dengan tier utamanya adalah petani, kelompok tani, pengepul, pedagang besar, dan pedagang kecil. Hasil perhitungan biaya logistik menunjukkan bahwa total biaya logistik sebesar Rp7.705,88/kg dengan 65,8% merupakan biaya yang berasal dari aktivitas material handling dan 34,2% lainnya adalah biaya dari aktivitas procurement, transportasi, inventory, maintenance, dan informasi. Strategi yang ditetapkan adalah sebaiknya melakukan penambahan aktivitas pasca panen pada tier petani, penerapan strategi efisien dan responsif pada tier kelompok tani, penerapan strategi pull supply chain pada tier pengepul, penerapan strategi pull-push supply chain pada tier pedagang besar, serta penerapan konsep Collaborative Planning, Forecasting, and Replensihment (CPFR) pada sistem rantai pasok sayur ini.

Kata kunci: Activity-Based Costing, logistik, strategi rantai pasok sayur

 

Abstract

This study aimed to a depiction of the vegetable supply chain structure, analysis of the logistics cost structure, and the development of alternative strategies for the vegetable supply chain tier to equalize income distribution and increase farmers' income. The total respondents in this study were 197 people. The method for analyzing logistics costs is Activity-Based Costing. The results of this study showed that vegetable commodity supply chain systems consisting of 5 tiers. The main actors were farmers, farmer groups, collectors, wholesalers, and small traders. The calculation of logistics costs showed that total logistic costs were IDR 7,705.88/kg, of which 65.8%  from material handling activities and another 34.2% was costs of procurement, transportation, inventory, maintenance, and information. The recommendation strategies were adding post-harvest activities for farmers, applying efficient and responsive strategies for farmer groups, applying the pull supply chain strategy for collectors, applying pull-push supply chain strategies for wholesalers, and applying concept Collaborative Planning, Forecasting, and Replensihment (CPFR) in the vegetable supply chain.

Keywords: Activity-Based Costing, logistics, vegetable supply chain strategy

 

 


Keywords


Activity-Based Costing; logistik; strategi rantai pasok sayur; logistics; vegetable supply chain strategy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Badan Pusat Statistik. (2016). Konsumsi Buah dan Sayur Survei Sosial Ekonomi Nasional 2016 Maret.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2017, November). Buletin Pemantauan Ketahanan Pangan Indonesia: Fokus Khusus: Tren Konsumsi dan Produksi Buah dan Sayur.

Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2004). Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation. Pearson and Prentice Hall.

Fredendall, L. D., & Hill, E. (2016). Basics of Supply Chain Management. CRC Press.

Guritno, A. D. (2016). Logistics cost structure analysis for the development of supply chain strategies on aquaculture business. Proceeding of the Asian Business & Management Conference.

Guritno, Adi Djoko. (2018). Agriculture Value Chain as an Alternative to Increase Better Income’s Distribution: The Case of Indonesia. In Agricultural Value Chain. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.70141

Guritno, Adi Djoko, Fujianti, R., & Kusumasari, D. (2015). Assessment of the supply chain factors and classification of inventory management in suppliers’ level of fresh vegetables. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 3, 51–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.01.012

Guritno, Adi Djoko, & Harsasi, M. (2014). Manajemen Rantai Pasokan. In Pengantar Manajemen Rantai Pasok (Supply Chain Management). Universitas Terbuka.

Guritno, Adi Djoko, & Khuriyati, N. (2018). An application of rapagrisk (rapid agricultural supply chain risk assessment) method on fresh vegetables for identifying and reducing damage during delivery to consumers. KnE Life Sciences, 4(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v4i2.1651

Hidayat, A. (2015). Kolaborasi Perencanaan Peramalan dan Pengisian Kembali Persediaan (CPRF). Supply Chain Indonesia.

Kim, S. M., & Mahoney, J. T. (2010). Collaborative planning, forecasting and replenishment (CPFR) as a relational contract: an incomplete contracting perspective. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 7(3/4), 403. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLIC.2010.034377

Ongkunaruk, P., & Piyakarn, C. (2011). Logistics cost structure for mangosteen farmers in Thailand. Systems Engineering Procedia, 2, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sepro.2011.10.006

Panesar, P. S., Chavan, Y., Chopra, H. K., & Kennedy, J. F. (2012). Production of microbial cellulose: Response surface methodology approach. Carbohydrate Polymers, 87(1), 930–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.002

Pishvaee, M. S., Basiri, H., & Sajadieh, M. sheikh. (2009). National Logistics Costs. In Supply Chain and Logistics in National, International and Governmental Environment (pp. 57–83). Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2156-7_4

Simchi-Levi, D. (2010). Operations Rules: Delivering Customer Value through Flexible Operations. MIT Press.

Wallin, C., Johnny Rungtusanatham, M., & Rabinovich, E. (2006). What is the “right” inventory management approach for a purchased item? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(1), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570610637012

Zeng, A. Z., & Rossetti, C. (2003). Developing a framework for evaluating the logistics costs in global sourcing processes. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 33(9), 785–803. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030310503334




https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.industria.2020.009.03.6

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.